The Hebrew Bible Scapegoat: Complicating a Frazerian Typology

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Smith, Caroline
dc.date.accessioned 2024-03-06T16:10:45Z
dc.date.available 2024-03-06T16:10:45Z
dc.date.issued 2023-02-11
dc.identifier.citation Smith, Caroline. "The Hebrew Bible Scapegoat: Complicating a Frazerian Typology." Paper presented at theShaking the Tree, Breaking the Bough: Frazer’s Golden Bough at 100, Melbourne, Australia, February 11, 2023. In New Age Movements, Occultism, and Spiritualism Research Library. Archives and Special Collections. Valdosta State University. Valdosta, GA. https://hdl.handle.net/10428/7060 en_US
dc.identifier.other 975A82D4-20E2-EAB7-419F-40809214912B
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10428/7060
dc.identifier.uri https://youtu.be/Ya4WvyiI7gU
dc.description 1 video file. ms150-40-010_smith-caroline_bible-scapegoat_2023-02-11.mp4 .mp4 399.17 MB 418,558,021 en_US
dc.description.abstract Although now methodologically outdated, The Golden Bough is credited with making decisive the scapegoat’s meaning as the innocent surrogate victim who is blamed and punished for the deeds of others. This victim’s namesake, the Hebrew Bible scapegoat that features in a collective rite of atonement (Leviticus 16), is regularly conceptualized in just these terms. Indeed, the practice of ascribing blame to an innocent party, or scapegoat, often entailing harm, mistreatment, and even death, is commonly understood to trace its origins to this Biblical rite in which the sins of the Israelites are symbolically placed upon a goat which is led to the wilderness in an act that ritually separates the people from their impurity. Yet the Biblical scapegoat was neither blamed, harmed, nor punished. Instead, it was a healing device, one whose meaning has become lost. My research aims to retrieve its original healing character, in part by proposing a critical corrective to its conceptualisation as Frazer’s surrogate victim. But this is not to argue that the Hebrew Bible lacks such a victim. Regularly overlooked in discourse about the Biblical scapegoat and its putative relationship with the practice that Frazer charts in The Golden Bough are events that follow the fall of Jericho (Joshua 7) in which people and animals appear to pay with their lives for the deeds of others. Those expecting to encounter the Frazerian scapegoat in its traditionally assigned home in the book of Leviticus may well be disappointed, but evidence for the practice whose name Frazer popularized may permeate the pages of Joshua. en_US
dc.format.mimetype video/mp4 en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher New Age Movements, Occultism, and Spiritualism Research Library en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries MS/150/40/;010
dc.rights Permission to post this digital asset provided by Caroline Smith to the Valdosta State University Archives & Special Collections to be part of the New Age Movements, Occultism, and Spiritualism Research Library. en_US
dc.subject Scapegoat--Religious aspects--Judaism en_US
dc.subject Scapegoat in literature en_US
dc.subject Bible. Joshua--Criticism and interpretation en_US
dc.subject Bible. Old Testament--Criticism and interpretation en_US
dc.subject Frazer, James George, 1854-1941. Golden bough. Abridged en_US
dc.subject Video recordings en_US
dc.title The Hebrew Bible Scapegoat: Complicating a Frazerian Typology en_US
dc.type Video en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Vtext


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account