Collective Teacher Efficacy, the Dimensions of Professional Learning Communities, and the Link to Achievement in High-Poverty Elementary Schools

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Marshall, Alexandra Leigh

Issue Date

2026-01-07

Type

Dissertation

Language

en_US

Keywords

Education, Elementary , Educational leadership , Early childhood education , Academic achievement , Professional learning communities , Dissertations, Academic

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to understand the complex relationships betweencollective teacher efficacy (CTE) beliefs, the dimensions of professional learning communities (PLCs), and academic achievement in high-poverty elementary schools in southeast Alabama. High-poverty schools with high student achievement were categorized as outlier schools, and those with low achievement were categorized as nonoutlier schools. The study followed a mixed-methods, convergent design. Data collection utilized a three-part survey including the Teacher’s Collective Efficacy Scale Short Form (CES-SF) (Goddard, 2002), the Professional Learning Community Assessment-Revised (PLCA-R) (Hipp & Huffman, 2010), and open-ended questions. No significant difference in collective teacher efficacy was identified between the two groups; however, qualitative data revealed that teachers from outlier schools saw student achievement data as evidence of collective efficacy, while teachers from non-outlier schools placed higher value in relationships. There was a significant difference between the two groups in shared vision and values and relationships, with the two dimensions being more prominent in outlier schools. Significant relationships were identified between individual dimensions of PLCs and CTE in both groups. Discussion of the key results explained possible cause for discrepancies between quantitative and qualitative results and how results could guide leaders of high-poverty schools.

Description

Citation

Publisher

License

This dissertation is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, revised in 1976). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of the materials for financial gain with the author's expressed written permissions is not allowed.

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

ISSN

EISSN