Clays and Clay Minerals, Vol. 59, No. 2, 200–211, 2011.
Loading...
Authors
Kaufhold, Stephan
Dohrmann, Reiner
Stucki, Joseph W.
Anastacio, Alexandre S.
Issue Date
2011
Type
Article
Language
Keywords
Periodicals , Geology , Alkylammonium Method , Layer Charge Density , Montmorillonite , Smectite , Structural Formula Method
Alternative Title
Layer Charge Density Of Smectites - Closing The Gap Between The Structural Formula Method And The Alkyl Ammonium Method
Abstract
The layer charge density (LCD) of montmorillonite represents the permanent negative charge, its most important property. The LCD can be determined by two different methods, the structural formula method(SF M) and the alkylammonium method(AAM). Other methods of determining the LCD are calibrated against one or the other of these. The results of the two methods differ systematically: SFM values are larger than AAM values and the difference increases with increasing layer charge density. In the present study, the critical parameters of both methods were considered quantitatively in order to identify the most likely reason for the systematic difference. One particularly important argument against the validity of the SFM is that typical SFM values correspond to unrealistically large CEC values that have never been reported. In addition, SFM does not consider the variable charge which causes cations to be adsorbed to the outer surface (at pH >4). In contrast to minor constituents, which can of course also affect SFM values, the variable charge can explain only part of the systematic difference. The exchange of pure smectite samples with both Cu-trien andalkyla mmonium revealedthe presence of non-exchangeable, nonstructural cations (Na, K, Ca). These cations, together with 10% (or more) variable charge, may explain the differences in LCD values. The non-exchangeable, non-structural cations could stem from undetected traces of feldspar or volcanic glass. The present samples indicated that the systematic difference in LCD values between the two methods is related to the amount of non-exchangeable, non-structural cations only, indicating that the two LCD methods probe different features of smectites. Using the SFM on pure smectite provides a value for the total number of charges (permanent with andwithout fixed(= non-exchangeable, non-structural) cations plus variable charge). The AAM, on the other hand, provides the charge density of the exchangeable cations (without variable charge).
Description
gsccm59208-kau.pdf -- 388KB
Citation
Clays and Clay Minerals, Vol. 59, No. 2, 200–211, 2011.
Publisher
License
Copyright © 2006-2018