Changing It Up: Exploring the Lived Experiences of Alternative School Teachers Who Implement Restorative Practices
Loading...
Authors
Long, Cindy
Issue Date
2026-01-15
Type
Dissertation
Language
en_US
Keywords
Education--Philosophy , Alternative schools , Teaching , Teachers , Dissertations, Academic , Restorative justice in schools , School discipline--Social aspects
Alternative Title
Abstract
This qualitative case study explored how teachers at RISE Academy, an alternative school in the southeastern United States, experienced the shift from punitive discipline to restorative practices (RP). Using interviews, surveys, observations, and researcher fieldnotes, I examined how teachers understood RP, how they used it in daily practice, and what challenges they faced. Findings showed that teachers relied most on everyday restorative conversations—accountability talk, redirection, calm tone-setting, empathy, and consistent follow-up—which proved more practical than formal restorative circles. Safe, welcoming classrooms and a collective responsibility approach involving interventionists, crisis team members, and teachers helped prevent escalation and support students quickly.Teacher readiness varied. Four archetypes emerged—Specialists, Skeptics, Inherent Restorers, and Mindset Shifters—and survey data showed no significant correlations between overall self-efficacy and comfort with RP, though disciplinary self-efficacy approached significance. Challenges included limited time, emotional demands, uneven expectations, and the early removal of punitive options. Still, teachers supported the intent of RP and described meaningful student growth. Implications indicate that sustainable RP implementation requires steady administrative support, transparent communication, strong support personnel, structured tier documentation, differentiated professional learning, and modeling or peer testimony to build buy-in. Future research could develop an RP playbook and explore additional archetypes or ideologies to guide differentiated training.
Description
Citation
Publisher
License
This dissertation is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, revised in 1976). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of the materials for financial gain with the author's expressed written permissions is not allowed.