Same but Different: Frazer’s Sympathetic Law of Similarity and the Greco-Roman defixiones

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Moorees, Saskia
dc.date.accessioned 2024-03-06T16:43:44Z
dc.date.available 2024-03-06T16:43:44Z
dc.date.issued 2023-02-12
dc.identifier.citation Moorees, Saskia. "Same but Different: Frazer’s Sympathetic Law of Similarity and the Greco-Roman defixiones." Paper presented at the Shaking the Tree, Breaking the Bough: Frazer’s Golden Bough at 100, Melbourne, Australia, February 12, 2023. In New Age Movements, Occultism, and Spiritualism Research Library. Archives and Special Collections. Valdosta State University. https://hdl.handle.net/10428/7064 en_US
dc.identifier.other A3BDDB58-968D-56AC-497F-7F7DD2969316
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10428/7064
dc.identifier.uri https://youtu.be/yk_hOBYI-LU
dc.description 1 video file. ms150-40-019_moorrees-saskia_frazers-sympathetic_2023-02-12.mp4 .mp4 350.96 MB 368,006,471 en_US
dc.description.abstract Frazer’s typology of ‘sympathetic magic’ proved especially popular in the study of ancient magic after it appeared in The Golden Bough. Frazer’s Law of Similarity, in particular, was predicated on the idea that according to ‘primitive’ thinking, ‘like affects like’ and that ‘an effect resembles its cause.’ But the idea that ‘similarity’ motivated the use of figurines has been contested, as scholars have rightly pointed out that physical resemblance seems to have not been a great concern in their production. However, this rejection of similarity has not occurred to the same degree in terms of the textual formulas of the Greco-Roman defixiones, and through this paper I will argue that similarity has an equally unconvincing role in executing textual analogies. By using S.J. Tambiah’s ‘persuasive analogy’ theory, which places emphasis on concurrent verbal statement and material action, we can reconsider whether the similia similibus formulas truly depended on a sympathetic ‘similarity’, or whether a different magical mechanism was being utilized. An analysis of the specific characteristics chosen in similia similibus formulas, how they relate to the object of comparison, and any accompanying ritual actions, will reveal the underlying magical process and thus allow us to question whether ‘like affects like’ was the belief informing these formulas. Through this close examination, I will contend that although a shared characteristic was the intended goal of these analogies, similarity was not the ‘sympathetic’ force behind them. Instead, we should understand these analogical techniques as deriving power from verbal and material actions, and we can thus move away from Frazer’s Law of Similarity. Additional Authors: Shaking the Tree, Breaking the Bough: Frazer's Golden Bough at 100 (Conference); Tully, Caroline Jane; Budin, Stephanie Lynn; University of Melbourne; en_US
dc.format.mimetype video/mp4 en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher New Age Movements, Occultism, and Spiritualism Research Library en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries MS/150/40/;019
dc.rights Permission to post this digital asset provided by Saskia Moorees to the Valdosta State University Archives & Special Collections to be part of the New Age Movements, Occultism, and Spiritualism Research Library. en_US
dc.subject Greco-Roman magic en_US
dc.subject Sympathetic magic en_US
dc.subject Curse tablets en_US
dc.subject Frazer, James George, 1854-1941. Golden bough en_US
dc.subject Video recordings en_US
dc.subject Conference papers and proceedings en_US
dc.subject Literary criticism en_US
dc.title Same but Different: Frazer’s Sympathetic Law of Similarity and the Greco-Roman defixiones en_US
dc.type Video en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Vtext


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account