Odum Library
dc.contributor.author | Kobbe, Eric S. | |
dc.coverage.spatial | United States. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-01T18:11:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-01T18:11:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Kobbe, Eric S., "Factors Influencing College Students’ Acceptance of Push Communication Technology as a Means of Receiving Course-Related Content," Ed.D. diss., Valdosta State University, May 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10428/3080. | |
dc.identifier.other | 0F102008-0AE7-909F-4A21-7DC7C122EF38 | UUID |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10428/3080 | |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this dissertation was to identify the factors that influence college students’ acceptance of push communication (i.e., email and SMS messaging) as a means of receiving course-related content. This research combined mobile learning models and technology acceptance theories along with push communication literature to determine if a scheduled message impacted students’ reception of the technology. This study was conducted through two universities and six professors with a total enrollment of 343 students. The surveys were pushed to each student via email and Short Message Service (SMS) text messaging, which resulted in 301 students that opted to participate in the study. A total of four research questions were answered by sixteen hypotheses, of which seven supported the research questions. The most significant of the results was that scheduled messages, the newest construct in the model, did not affect the students’ intention to use push communication as a means to receive course-related content. These findings, based on the survey results, were then compared to actual usage patterns by using Google Analytics embedded in courses’ HTML landing pages. | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | I. INTRODUCTION 1 | Problem Statement 3 | Purpose Statement 4 | Definitions 5 | Conceptual Framework 7 | Data Collection 8 | Research Questions 12 | Significance of Study 14 | Assumptions 15 | Limitations 15 | Overview of the Dissertation Chapters 16 | Summary 17 | II. LITERATURE REVIEW 18 | Mobile Learning Models 19 | Universal Instructional Design Principles 25 | Technology Acceptance Theories 30 | Spaced Retrieval Theories 59 | III. METHODOLOGY 61 | Research Model 61 | Research Design 67 | Data Analysis 75 | IV. DATA ANALYSIS 78 | Description of the Respondents 78 | Partial Least Squares Path Modeling Results 80 | The Research Model Test 87 | V. CONCLUSION 110 | Summary of the Study 110 | Discussion of the Findings 110 | Contributions of the Study 123 | Limitations of the Study 125 | Suggested Future Research 126 | Summary 127 | REFERENCES 128 | APPENDIX A: Institution Review Board Protocol Exemption Report 141 | APPENDIX B: Institution Review Board Protocol Exemption Report 143 | APPENDIX C: Push Communication Technology Survey 145 | APPENDIX D: Screenshot of Scheduled Email HTML Page 149 | APPENDIX E: Screenshot of Schedule SMS in HTML Page 151 | APPENDIX F: Screenshot of Schedule SMS in Google Analytics 153 | | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1 PDF, 165 pages. | |
dc.format.medium | Dissertations; Electronic records (digital records); PDF; | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Dissertations, Academic--United States | en_US |
dc.subject | Education | en_US |
dc.subject | Text messages (Cell phone systems) | en_US |
dc.subject | Electronic mail messages | en_US |
dc.subject | Educational technology | en_US |
dc.subject | Telecommunication systems--Technological innovations | en_US |
dc.title | Factors Influencing College Students’ Acceptance of Push Communication Technology as a Means of Receiving Course-Related Content | en_US |
dc.type | Dissertation | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Curriculum, Leadership, and Technology of the Dewar College of Education | en_US |
dc.description.advisor | Leader, Lars F. | |
dc.description.committee | Gibson, Nicole M. | |
dc.description.committee | Hsiao, E-Ling | |
dc.description.committee | Marshall, Bryan | |
dc.description.committee | LaPlant, James T. | |
dc.description.degree | Ed.D. | en_US |
dc.description.major | Education in Leadership | en_US |