dc.contributor.author	Milam, Thomas Wesley
dc.coverage.spatial	United States	en_US
dc.date.accessioned	2023-05-24T20:45:34Z
dc.date.available	2023-05-24T20:45:34Z
dc.date.issued	2023-04-26
dc.identifier.other	41f56b35-b0ae-4d56-be5b-1609f1b32232	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10428/6729
dc.description.abstract	Public distrust and a reduction in police legitimacy have eroded the public’s perception of police officers, thus creating a sparse applicant pool. Representative bureaucracy theory posits that a public organization should reflect the community the organization serves. Traditionally, the steps a police agency takes to select an applicant for hire can be many, often including difficult obstacles which are used to predict the applicant’s competency and success in law enforcement as a career. These steps test the applicant’s mental and physical ability but can also involve an in-depth investigation into the applicant’s past behaviors and interviews with current police personnel. Each of these steps can vary among police agencies and have various benchmarks and minimum standards that an applicant must achieve before moving on to the next step, which is to ultimately attain employment at the agency. The varied nature of these tests is believed to be rife with subjectivity and highly susceptible to bias. Therefore, an agency may be unfairly eliminating applicants who could perform satisfactorily as an officer (false negative) or could select an applicant who cannot succeed as an officer but only got hired by passing the tests (false positive). This research sought to determine if the steps in a typical hiring process, including written examinations, physical agility examinations, background investigations, and applicant interviews, are contributing to the agency’s hiring of minorities to satisfy the requirements of representative bureaucracy. Through interviewing members of police departments in the southern United States about the hiring process the agency utilizes, these processes were analyzed against standards designed to reduce bias and be effective measures for selecting qualified applicants as police officers.	en_US
dc.format.extent	1 electronic record (.pdf), 114 pages, 1,406,753 bytes.	en_US
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf	en_US
dc.language.iso	en_US	en_US
dc.rights	This dissertation is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, revised in 1976). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of the materials for financial gain with the author's expressed written permissions is not allowed.	en_US
dc.subject	Public administration	en_US
dc.subject	Criminology	en_US
dc.subject	Dissertations, Academic	en_US
dc.subject	Examinations	en_US
dc.subject	Employee selection	en_US
dc.subject	Police	en_US
dc.title	Representative Bureaucracy Among Law Enforcement Agencies: An Analysis of Police Hiring Processes	en_US
dc.type	Dissertation	en_US
dc.contributor.department	Department of Political Science of the College of Humanities and Social Sciences	en_US
dc.description.advisor	Beach, Butch
dc.description.committee	Bogart, Denise
dc.description.committee	Kroutter, Paul
dc.description.degree	D.P.A.	en_US
dc.description.major	Public Administration	en_US